Hicks and Gillett have splashed more cash on Liverpool than United, Arsenal, and Chelsea

Tom Hicks and George Gillett are being chased out of Liverpool but they can’t be accused of failing to back their managers.
Since the Yanks arrived Liverpool have spent almost £170million on new players. Only two Premier League clubs have spent more. Manchester City have invested an incredible £426m and Tottenham £177m.

Even Manchester United (£142m),Chelsea(£112 m)and Arsenal(£71m) can’t match the Kop’s transfer outlay. Hodgson spent £20m before the August window closed.

- Comments (7)

Expand all

The story is too old to be commented.

karim4944d ago

Very Surprised !!! Man United Have Spent More than Chelsea on Players ! oh that's why they say we're buying the league thank you mirrorfootball for telling the truth <3 and Tottenham wow and CITY WOWWWWWWWWWWWW 423M ON PLAYERS !!! WTH

Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

RedDevils4943d ago (Edited 4943d ago )

look at the legit link and you know why chelsea is one of the big spender, and they SPEND BIGGER than United

look who is second?
http://www.transferleague.c...

Mirrorfootball only put a small but not detail enough for the fact

Btw the reason we spend big, is because We make more money than any of other clubs, on the other hand Chelsea spend more than they make the reason got the money cause there a sugar daddy in their club

Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate

kulka4944d ago

Total rubbish we had to sell players to buy new ones last year we selled alonso for 30 milion we bought Aquilani and Jonhson for 38 milion and it happened all the time

Agree 0 Disagree 0

SPAM Inappropriate