Suarez Ban: written reasons, full report

linguistic from the universality of Manchester, very very fair.

and they confirmed that its not the same "negro" from slave history used in North america.

and what sort of bastard would evra be since he persistently confronted Suarez and threatening him with physical violence and insulted his family, witch is the worst thing to do in south america. and evra even used a racial slur himself, but that is fair right mance's

Keep making up excuses. I mean, that's all Liverpool supporters have been doing since the Premier League began anyway.

Have you even read the report? Suarez admitted calling him a 'negro' but do you wanna know what his defence was?

"Mr Suarez maintained that when he said "Por que,negro?" to Mr Evra, it was intended in a conciliatory and friendly way."

... because we all know how Liverpool vs Man Utd matches are always a friendly occasion.

Also the report claims that there was video footgage that was not broadcast that shows the two exchanging words in the penalty area in the 63rd minute.

And yeah you're right there is no solid evidence of what was exactly said but Suarez's evidence was 'unreliable in matters of critical importance' and 'inconsistent with the contemporaneous evidence, especially the video footage'.

Evra was all over Suarez flowing him around trying to stir something, he insulted his family and also used raciest language and threatening him , Suarez was basically saying "drop it".

and it was a corner, the DeGea, Valencia and Hernandez all Spanish, all were their, all ply for MU said they didn't hear anything directly, it was all a story from Evra's point that doesn't fit the character of Suarez who has a charity agenst racism in South Africa.

Lol blind and ignorant 'pool fans alongside Queen Kenny and with Liverpool joke statement that sum it all, backing up a racist, people should know this is beyond club loyalty

No he didn't deny them all. He said his use of the word was conciliatory toward Evra in his own statement. In other words trying to be friendly to Evra. Evra had every right to pursue this if he felt racially abused, don't blame him for the decision of the committee.

Suarez admitted using the word and also had to make a statement where he tried to alter what he said and kept towing the misunderstanding line which if you read it through properly, the FA has quite rightly decided was a load of nonsense and totally inconsistent.

Suarez's only half decent defence was the different use of the word but the F.A pointed out it does not hold weight in a conciliatory context as Suarez claimed. It clearly DOES NOT when the argument continued for some time after. This was not a friendly confrontation (if you need evidence of it the ref and other players confirm that much). Anyone that believes that is NAIVE and delusional to say the least.

The commission thus determined that Suarez's intentions were to cause offence. Their findings seem to be mostly based on what Suarez admitted to have said and what was seen rather than just what Evra said. Its more like Suarez's own statement against his defence, and it just doesn't hold up.

He has been punished on this basis, its not too different from someone threatening someone else with a gun. The person admits to pointing the gun- Just because they didn't pull the trigger so everyone else could see and their defence is that it was a 'friendly' gesture doesn't make it a believable excuse.....

I find it even more reprehensible that his defence would dare to accuse Evra of making it all up. Its a very sordid affair and does Suarez no favours at all. Liverpool need to move on quickly and cover this over because it has potentially damaged the reputation of the club somewhat.

De Gea doesn't need to be dragged into this because it clearly says in the FA report...

"We found it unsurprising that Mr De Gea did not hear any exchange. He appears from the video footage to be focused on the corner, and looking mainly in that direction."

they questioned Suarez in dutch, Spanish and English, what do you expect.

Evra was questioned while he was viewing the video, he explained his version clip by clip, Suarez wasn't aloud to see any footage.

also the referee notes from the game were destroyed by the FA, they contained detailed info of what the players said that day, thy alowd Evra to start over and get his story right, in the other hand comments were registered from Suarez that day.

very very fair.

some her say its right to ban him , but wrong to ban Evra for using racist language himself, also no ban for starting a confrontation?

biased hippocrates