440°

Microsoft’s New Studios Will Help Them Appeal to the Market in the Future- NPD Analyst

More studios means more content, more content means more chances at appealing to the market.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
2147d ago Replies(5)
UCForce2147d ago

It’s up to them. But here two things I want from MS First Party Game:

First, A Single Player Focus game and a Memorable character and great gameplay as well with no MT and no modernization.

Second, in my previous statements, if one of MS First Party Studio want to create a shock value in their game, then MS have to let them do their developers to do their own vision, not interfere them.

Also one more thing, stop saying making Single Player games are so “complicated”. I know it’s hard to make Single Player games, but that is a challenge and I promised to you, MS. If you made Strong Single Player game, your work will pay off.

TheCommentator2146d ago

"MS have to let them do their developers to do their own vision, not interfere them."

Maybe if you quit talking $#!+ all the time and did a little research, you'd have realized years ago that MS does give their studios freedom to do what they want. I'm not even going to bother to provide links because there's so many times it's been talked about.

thatguyhayat2146d ago

No they dont, former lion head studios confirmed in an interview they had no freedom. They had a new ip in development a sci fi game but was told to scrap it and keep developing fable. Look at what happened with scalebound too. The developer didn't want to have a multiplayer in his game but was told to and after difference of opinions they canceled the game. You can check hes tweets if you want. Cause he showed his frustration there

TheCommentator2146d ago

@ that guy

You show me your sources and I'll show you mine! ;P

neutralgamer19922146d ago (Edited 2146d ago )

Thecommen

No we don't need to see your source because facts are in front of our eyes. Right when they bought the gears IP they basically told that studio to shelf its new IP in favor of gears

Go ahead look it up since it seems you like looking up things. They are so dumb because when the bought rare they thought donkey Kong was part of the purchase go ahead this is a fact look it up

As a fan of gaming I don't want to sound like I am hating on them I just don't want them to keep making the same mistakes again and again

I am not even asking for every developer to work on single player games but if there is an idea from their developers to take some chances and make a brand new story driven IP give them time and resources

Xbox brand is where it is today because it had early success with Xbox360 and thought we could just keep making the same games. Nintendo and don't both take chances while ms should have learned from both

trooper_2146d ago

Bwhaha, freedom?

There's several developers who complained about working under Microsoft. So why was Scalebound canceled if they gave developers freedom? Oh...wait.

81BX2146d ago

Love the fake concern here. Like every game on xbox is the same. Get over it dudes. MS has turned over a new leaf. While you guys keep crying about the same old talking points, gamers have moved on. Look at all the non freedom devs have. Smh

Edito2146d ago

Yes you a right, many times talked about, they never walked the talk... They just talk... That's what most think they will do, I think they will screw with all these studios.

UCForce2146d ago

@81BX if I remember correctly, Lionhead did want to create a game that was dark and gritty, but MS just completely refused it. MS have another problem that called is their sensitive side which mean MS don’t like their game to have shock value.

Heavy Rain was supposed to be Xbox 360 Exclusive but the game did have kidnapping scene that MS tried to censor it. QD disagreed and they switched to Sony for better results. Like I said, If one of MS First Party Studio want to create a shock value in their game, then MS have to let developers to do their own vision, not interfere them.

Johnyra2146d ago (Edited 2146d ago )

Triggered.He didn't even say bad things.

BiggerBoss2146d ago

@Commentator

Yeah, im sure that Black Tusk (the Coalition) just LOVED cancelling the game that they were working on just to make a new Gears game. Real creative freedom right there.

TheCommentator2146d ago (Edited 2146d ago )

@ Bigger Boss

"Black Tusk started with a team of approximately 20 full-time staff in 2012 as the project began preproduction, adding staff to grow to almost 100 by the end of 2013. That’s when the Microsoft Studios mothership presented it with a unique scenario and a difficult choice. We could continue working on the IP we were working on," Crump says. "Or we had the opportunity to take on Gears of War."

"I’d be lying if I said there weren’t some people on the team who were disappointed when they found out the thing they’d been working on for so long was going to be shelved," Crump says. "If you’ve been in the game industry long enough, you’re going to go through project cancellations. People go through this period of mourning a bit. You have to give them that space and time to go through that, the sense of loss that people have around something they’re invested in." But according to Crump, in the end, the final decision was a "no-brainer."

Source: https://www.polygon.com/201...

Any other ignorant comments?

UCForce2146d ago

But still, I rather let them focus new IP instead of Gears. Because it can give them a new identity.

BiggerBoss2146d ago

@commentator

So you would rather ANOTHER Gears Of War game INSTEAD of brand new IP??

Does that really sound like creative freedom to you?!

LandoCalrissiano2146d ago

If they didn't give their studios freedom then why would they be putting a lot of their eggs in the indie scene? SoD2, ori, (publishing) cuphead, etc., along with the delays of crackdown shows in recent history that they are fine with earning less revenue that indies bring while giving games they believe in extra time. Things like lionhead and Scalebound must have had problems so large that dumping money into crackdown is a better option than pursuing those things at the time. For a company nicknamed moneysoft sticking with indies and canceling projects doesn't seem like it brings in the bucks, but this grew sales and users which proves something is going right. There is no way in hell crackdown brings in more money than fable. Either they have more freedom than people think, or they really aren't as money hungry as people think, which is it?

agent45322146d ago

The only studios that Microsoft has given creative freedom and to do as they please is Microsoft Studios and Rare

rainslacker2146d ago

Wasn't the coalition working on a new ip when ms pushed gears into them? Their other two.major studios make halo and forza. Lion head only made fable. Rare I guess was given freedom to make Kinect games. Ms wanted bungle to make another halo.and they didn't want to.

That doesnt seem much like allowing freedom to me. Maybe they're allowed to have more input on the design of the games they are told to make, but to be.able to start.something new ms hasn't really shown they are for that

TheCommentator2145d ago (Edited 2145d ago )

@ Rainslacker

"Wasn't the coalition working on a new ip when ms pushed gears into them?"
Thanks for reading the quote I pulled from the article.

"Their other two.major studios make halo and forza. Lion head only made fable."
Yeah, but that fact doesn't prove that MS is responsible for the developers only making those games. Again, where's your sources?

"Ms wanted bungle to make another halo.and they didn't want to."
Yeah, that one is true because Bungie wanted to make Destiny, and look how that one turned out. Could you imagine the flak MS would have gotten for producing Destiny instead of another Halo? Wise choice on MS' part, don't you agree?

rainslacker2145d ago

So you're saying that two studios that traditionally made those games, are responsible for always wanting to work on those games? Talented devs, who all have their own ideas for what kinds of games they want to make? That defies all logic.

And so what if Destiny was a bust. And how exactly did it turn out? It made a lot of money, and the first one was pretty good by many people's accounts. The second had some stupid crap attached to it, but that has nothing to do with MS saying no, and not allowing Bungie the freedom they wanted. In fact, MS saying no, is exactly my point.

It's easy to look back with 20/20 vision, but MS didn't take the risk. They didn't afford them the freedom, and nothing really suggests that MS allows their studios freedom, because as I laid out, outside of SoT, none of their studios is making anything new. Even their new studio, the Coalition, is now making Gears, instead of going after what they originally started with.

TheCommentator2145d ago (Edited 2145d ago )

@ Rain

"Even their new studio, the Coalition, is now making Gears, instead of going after what they originally started with."

Now, I'll repost part of the quote I pulled from the linked article:
"That’s when the Microsoft Studios mothership presented it with a unique scenario and a difficult choice. We could continue working on the IP we were working on," Crump says. "Or we had the opportunity to take on Gears of War."

You obviously don't care about facts as long as they're made up and come out of your mouth. You assume that because the devs are only making sequels that they didn't want to and are being forced? How dumb. Besides Black Tusk, all five of the new MS studios praised MS for their creative freedom too, and Rare, but you can't be bothered with quotes or links when all you want to do is sound important and make trouble.

Pull an article that says MS is forcing 343, Turn 10, or any other devs and maybe we'll talk... otherwise STFU because you remind me of Trump's "fake news".

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 2145d ago
Rachel_Alucard2146d ago

@UCforce

You're living in dreamland if you ever think anything will come true from MS of all people. They are trying to rake in checks, instead of fans.

Vasto2147d ago

What you saw was just a small sample. More studios are coming.

2147d ago Replies(6)
Bhai2146d ago

Funny, NOTHING... absolutely NOTHING MS does this generation works... BC, cloud, X-play... nothing helped them save upon their falling marketshare... hehehe while Sony keeps loading up more and the highest marketshare all along, this new move itself sees only Ninty getting the upperhand... more proof crap stays crap, no matter what you do... zero improvement, that is xb1 ;)

Vasto2146d ago (Edited 2146d ago )

LMAO, nothing worked. So clueless about business.
https://venturebeat.com/201...

All we care about is the $$$$$. Thats how you step on the E3 stage and announce 5 new studios, Xbox One X delivering True 4K pc quality performance, Backwards compatibility 4K Enhanced titles and Xbox Game Pass delivering over 150 titles per month for only $9.99.

You can have your sales numbers. Give us the $$$$$$$$$$ LMAO
#SoMuchSalt

2146d ago
Vasto2146d ago

You show me your $499 PC playing Forza Motorsport 7 at native 4K / 60 FPS you wont have to give it away. I will buy it from you. LOL

2146d ago
Vasto2146d ago (Edited 2146d ago )

Xbox One X is a beast. Its actually getting better now that devs have gotten familiar with it.

2146d ago
Vasto2146d ago

Its better than your PC!!!!!!

LOL

2146d ago
UCForce2146d ago

Now I can see you want revenge on Sony fanboys. Hmm, I can see your MS inner fanboy. Like I said, you are happy to see N4G will take over by Xbots. After all, you want this to happen.

Rachel_Alucard2146d ago

I have never seen a bigger shill/fanboy.

Bhai2146d ago (Edited 2146d ago )

So, you're more delusional than Phil himself hehehe, you think revenues in a 'quarter' gets MS more marketshare i.e. more stakeholders, keener interest, more business partners, more investment from the 3rd party???
This past year ending March 31st 2018 saw Playstation business garnering 18 Billion$ for Sony among other businesses. You add MS' 2.25billion four times (which it is not) and you still end up under 10Billion for the whole year hahahaha XD :D

From the article:
"The PlayStation gaming division saw revenue for the year top $18 billion, an 18% increase over the previous year with credit being given to PS4 software sales as a key component of that growth."

Read here and learn:
https://wccftech.com/sony-g...

So, selling 19 million consoles in year 2017-18, Sony group not only thrives with around 50% marketshare, but is also making TWICE the billions of profit than xb1!!! hahaha... seems, everything MS does really sucks, PROVEN!

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 2146d ago
agent45322146d ago

I hope not for most of Microsoft 1st party are stuck making one franchise and that's it. Rare is the exception

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2146d ago
RainbowBrite2147d ago

Sure. If they make good games

2147d ago Replies(3)
Show all comments (136)
80°

Fallout 76 Players Have Nuked Phil Spencer in Response to Studio Closures

Fallout 76 players have dropped the big one on Phil Spencer in response to Xbox's closures of Arkane Austin and Tango Gameworks this week.

100°

Meet The Guy Who Just Nuked Xbox Boss Phil Spencer In Fallout 76

He said he treated the Xbox executive like the RPG's final boss

Jingsing3h ago

Somewhat fitting, Considering buying Bethesda was a complete selfish purchasing decision by himself just because he is a big Fallout fan he wanted to own the toy. Well quite frankly Microsoft should look at that and say you put your personal tastes in front of the business and it has backfired.

anast1m ago

Todd Howard out hustled Phil. Howard is definitely in the top 3 all time hustlers in video game history.

310°

Sarah Bond dodges questions on Xbox studio closures

While on stage with Dina Bass at The Bloomberg Technology Summit the President of Xbox, Sarah Bond, was asked about the Xbox studio closures of Arkane Austin, Tango Gameworks, Alpha Dog, and Roundhouse Studios

17h ago
ApocalypseShadow14h ago

Of course she did. She's part of the problem and will just tow the company line.

VenomUK12h ago(Edited 12h ago)

Bloomberg’s Dina Bass could barely read her scripted question without looking at her notes, whilst Sarah Bond who WAS expecting the question spoke without saying anything of substance or answering the question in any meaningful way. Clearly she’s had the same expert PR training as Phil, but this avoidance was disrespectful. In time the short-sighted decision to shut down Tango Gameworks will be seen as of the most notorious examples why Phil Spencer messed up his tenure in charge of Xbox. That’s a fully built out talented team that could’ve been put to work on any project.

Additionally, Phil Spencer should not be using Sarah Bond as a patsy for his mistakes- he should be answering that question.

gleepot9h ago

I think you are all really overselling Tangos value. Hi-Fi rush was a lot of fun. Ghostwire was incredibly dull. Evil within 1 and 2 were just okay.

lucasnooker9h ago

Evil within 2 was incredibly under rated. I thought that game was surprisingly good

NotoriousWhiz6h ago

Someone else said it best. I don't think it was a Phil decision. It was most likely a Satya decision. I think Microsoft is done giving out free money to Xbox.

Cacabunga3h ago

people please boycott Activision Bethesda next release and support Hellblade.
these people mus understand that they cannot treat their fans and employees that way.
scumbags.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3h ago
XiNatsuDragnel12h ago

Yikes you don't help Sarah 😬 making a problem worse

Christopher11h ago

She's playing her role. There's absolutely nothing any of them can say other than the truth, this is about profit margins and not quality, so they just don't answer anything and wait for gamers to forget.

shinoff21831h ago

I think news is coming of more ps5 release but they gotta be careful cause Xbox is still sitting on store shelves. They can't get left holding all that stock

Lightning773m ago

Come next month they'll flash nice looking games in our faces and expecting us to forget.

The only thing that'll be going through my mind at their showcase is how many of those studios will get shut down after release.

I'm not joking around either. MS probably expects every game to be like COD and do COD numbers. What a way to destroy gaming for the entire industry because they're dumb af at being realistic in what success means for each game.

zaanan2h ago

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss

Hofstaderman12h ago

Like a deer caught in the headlights.....

notachance12h ago

I always wondered why xbox had multiple leaders with similar titles like Phil Spencer, Matt Booty, and Sarah Bond, like, how many heads do you actually need?

Seems to me it would be more cost efficient to cut 2 of them instead of all those studios.

DarXyde11h ago

Frankly, I suspect she is the most competent of them. I don't mean that I like her more, I mean that she's the best at articulating herself and giving the talking points MS wants to give. The others are starting to sound more like her than her sounding like any of them.

Are any of these people "responsible" for what's happening? No. This reeks of Nadella. But that being said, I don't see any of the Xbox heads stepping down in protest.

"Don't shoot the messenger", sure, but at the same time, the messengers don't seem to take umbrage with the message. Not enough to remove themselves from it, anyway.

RpgSama4h ago

Dude, 100%, forgot Major Nelson and Aaron Greenberg, like what is the point for all these suits? They have more C-level executives than games released in a generation.

This is just so they can all pass along the hot potato one at a time and in between all of them can say a lot without actually saying anything, misinformation at its finest.

Show all comments (31)