360°

Revisiting The Order: 1886 with developer Ready At Dawn

We look back at one of the prettiest — and shortest — PS4 exclusives

sampsonon2077d ago (Edited 2077d ago )

make a sequel. take my money.

i played it with my girl on halloween with two glasses and a bottle of wine.....
we loved it. this was a year after everyone bashed it so we didn't go in with any negativity.
you would be surprised how much of a difference that makes when playing a game without all the noise.

at least make a comic or a show because i want to see what happens.

jimbost792077d ago (Edited 2077d ago )

I thought it was brilliant too mate. Went in with zero expectations and thoroughly enjoyed my time with it. It looked great, played well and the story and setting were brilliant too.
The length of the game wasnt an issue for me. Id prefer quality over quantity any day of the week.
Definitely deserves a sequel.

playnice2077d ago

I gotta give it a shot! Got it for dirt cheap but never opened it ...

bouzebbal2077d ago

I loved it too, but full price for a couple hours and no repeatability is what caused the mixed reviews..
It's a 10/10 game for 20 bucks,that's 4 sure

Skull5212077d ago

I didn't get in more than two hours before it bored me to death, I certainly never finished it. The game got the criticism it deserved, that doesn't mean you can't like it.

jimbost792077d ago (Edited 2077d ago )

Lets click on an article about a game that bored me to death, and tell people it's ok to like it. Well thanks mate, i feel much better now i have your approval and im sure everyone else does too. I wasn't sure wether or not it was allowed to like it. Thanks again

Skull5212077d ago

The article is specifically called "Revisiting The Order"

Are you only allowed to revisit if you liked it? The game was terrible, and nearly every review was honest about that fact.

NecrumOddBoy2077d ago

The Order only suffered from a few small things (crappy collection system, nav system and extreme linearity) and one major design flaw with its popup target style of combat. With a wide-linear design for more exploration and a better combat system, the sequel would be a GOTY contender. The art, sound, weapons, graphics, acting, story, script, and world was perfect and one of the most enjoyable experiences this gen.

Knights!!!

jimbost792077d ago

@skull521
Bit of a twat arent you? Why on earth would you revist a game you hated? The game was terrible in your opinion.
I dont give a fuck about reviews, ill judge for myself what i like. For example horizon got great reviews and guess what, i couldnt get into it for whatever reason. Now im not gonna go to any threads about horizon and tell people there who enjoyed it that it was shit.
That would make me a dick.

brando0082077d ago

In the same boat all the way

RememberThe3572076d ago (Edited 2076d ago )

Oh Jim don't worry about the douche, douches will be douches. The game wasnt even trashed in reviews, it was too short, didn't have any replay value, and not enough variation. That not trashing a game, that's calling out it's weaknesses. The game is still one of he prettiest ever made and the world is amazing. It was a fun game to get through but I wanted so much more and Ready at Dawn and Sony just left it sitting there. This and Heavenly Sword are two great game that will probably never see sequels, yet some how we got Knack 2... 😒

jc122076d ago (Edited 2076d ago )

@Jimbost79 You thought The Order was "brilliant?"

Guys, I understand this message board is very pro Sony, but lets not get carried away here.

@Bouzebbal "Its a 10/10 game."

What? What the hell are you guys smoking? If this game was a 10/10, then The Last of Us is a 20/10. Give me a break.

jimbost792076d ago

@jc12 yea i did. Thats the thing with different people's tastes and opinions. They differ.
I really enjoyed the order, im not saying it was perfect and it had its faults. But i think with a sequel they could create something truly special.
Last of us was a good game but for me not this masterpiece eveyone raves about. But i can see how people do think it is, and i wouldn't say their opinion is wrong.
Same with horizon zero dawn, i got aloy to lvl 20 but couldn't bring myself to carry on. Did finish lou tho. Will probably give horizon another go at some point aswel.
Im only pro sony when i think theyve created a great game. Like ive already said i dont listen to reviews ill form my own opinion on games. Gow and U4 my 2 favourite exclusives this gen. I wouldnt care if they had a 40 metacritic they would remain my favourites.
There's no right or wrong here. Just different peoples different opinions. If you think its shit, fair enough. I think it was brilliant.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 2076d ago
Vandamme212077d ago (Edited 2077d ago )

I agree with you...the game was awesome...I want a sequel to.

CP_Company2077d ago

Played this year. Enjoyed a lot. Only gripe is lenght. There is a lot of lore there, which begging to be explore.

sprinterboy2077d ago

Thoroughly enjoyed it too at launch, my only regret was buying digital as I had no trade in value after my 2nd playthrough. Got about 20hrs of playtime so got my my money's worth imo, sequel would be much welcome and learn from some the mistakes they made werewolf battles as a example but great game non the less.

thatguyhayat2077d ago

Didn't they say this would be a franchise years ago? The way it ended they need to make a sequel

nucky642077d ago (Edited 2077d ago )

i'm with you sampsonon - i loved the story and i want a werewolf vs vampires war!

edit: bouzebbal - it wasn't a 2 hour game. my first playthrough was 9 hours.

sampsonon2077d ago

@bouzebbal: "I loved it too, but full price for a couple hours and no repeatability is what caused the mixed reviews..
It's a 10/10 game for 20 bucks,that's 4 sure"

I'm sorry, but the amount of work they put into the game, and it wasn't a couple hrs, would be an insult at $20.
i spend more than $60 for dinner and a movie for two, and that is only 2 hrs.

like people say " i would rather play a game that is quality over a game that isn't but is longer."

sampsonon2077d ago

i think people are confusing a cheap Tetale game with the production of a game like the order. not even close friends. by maybe 90 million

porkChop2077d ago

If it had launched at a more reasonable price I think the game would have been fine.

But $60 for a 5-6 hour game with little replayability was too much for many people.

sampsonon2076d ago (Edited 2076d ago )

it wasn't 5 - 6 hrs long unless you sped through it. game took me about 10 hrs playing casually, meaning searching and looking at the beauty.
the game being $60 had nothing to do with length it had to do with the amount of time and money that went into the game. it's not a cheap Telltale game, no disrespect to Telltale Games, in that the quality and time spent working on detail is why they charge what they did. i would rather pay $60 for the world building they did than pay $20 for a cartoon Telltale game. as much as i like Telltale games.

PhantomS422077d ago

The game clearly has potential, it really does need a sequel for a chance to shine.

sinspirit2077d ago

It felt like a small hint of Uncharted in a gritty old London atmosphere with a sprinkle of Resistance with its weapons. The game itself was very underrated, it was short if you sped through it but it was well done. With how open Sony normally is to franchise potential it really feels like they dropped the ball here. I think they'll pick it back up eventually.

The game would have made a lot of sense if they made an online horde mode. Maybe, the Order will drink a concoction to drift off into a mental battleground with hordes of ethereal monsters, and this prepares them for the real deal.

TheGoodestBoi2077d ago

I really enjoyed it too. In fact it was my first ever platinum for playstation.

bangoskank2077d ago (Edited 2077d ago )

I also played it more recently so expectations weren't affected by the mixed reviews it received at launch. The visuals, voice acting, writing, and score were all top notch. I would love to return to this universe with more of the shooter mechanics. The quick time events hardly bothered me because everything else was so great.

brando0082077d ago

Yup, fully agreed. Got it for a steal, had low expectations, and was utterly blown away by the quality of the game. Definitely one of my favourites on PS4

nicsaysdie2076d ago

For realz yo. I bought this game for twelve bucks during all the hate speech. I fully went in expecting a dumpster fire with how bad it was received. I came away with a great experience. It was super fun and beautiful. Best looking game for sure at the time, and still looks amazing. As far as the story goes, it was great. And the length, it was the perfect length for the story it told. Ready at dawn, if you're listening, please continue. Don't let this amazing story die.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 2076d ago
spirited2077d ago

This deserved a sequel more than Knack
are u with me guys?

sprinterboy2077d ago

Agree sort of as had a blast with the kids with knack

Shiken2077d ago

I loved the game, beat it twice and got the plat. It had a lot of untapped potential and I feel it deserves another shot. The criticism the first got was deserved, but what was there was great IMO.

Let the learn from their mistakes and move forward with the IP. If they listen to the feedback from the first, we could have a real gem on our hands.

RememberThe3572076d ago

How did you read my mind 13 hrs ago?

Platformgamer2076d ago

knack deserved a sequel because it's a good game.
same goes for the order 1886, i want a sequel for it too

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2076d ago
leahcim2077d ago

Sony must give RAD the chance of redeem themselves !
They deserve it
Have you played Daxter or Chains of Olympus?? those previous games were amazing

Spurg2077d ago

Ready at dawn need to make a sequel to the order. I absolutely loved that game.

cfc832077d ago

The Order is to ps4 what Ryse is to xb1.

TheEnigma3132077d ago

Both could have been way better sequels.

nucky642077d ago

not sure why you'd mention/think that; but, kind of off topic.

cfc832077d ago

Isn't OT. Both games got alot of criticism, and some harsh reviews, but alot of people who actually paid for them enjoyed the games.

PowerOfTheCloud2077d ago

Cfc83
But ryse is a multiplatform game, while the order is an exclusive so i don't get the comparison.

spicelicka2077d ago

But The Order is a Sony exclusive and Ryse is a Microsoft exclusive, so just get the comparison.

Rimeskeem2077d ago

Really? Cause I remember xbox people defending Ryse.

spicelicka2077d ago

And PS people defend The Order, right in this article even. Are you reading?

spicelicka2077d ago

Agree with this. Both games had beautiful graphics, great well acted stories, and visceral gameplay. The length and gameplay depth fell short for both, but they're great games.

Ratchet752077d ago

Ryse definitely deserved a sequel but i believe crytek is on their last leg and close to bankruptcy

cfc832077d ago

Pitty nobody could buy the i.p. Crytek sold a couple of titles to thq nordic.

carcarias2076d ago

For whatever it's worth, I thought the same thing. It's definitely interesting to note the similarities. Not sure why you have so many downvotes.

Both games shouldered the huge burden of being technical showpieces early on in their respective console cycles. People had huge expectations for them but both games were on the short side with game mechanics that, while solid and enjoyable, people had seen many times before.

However, like you said, both games got a bit of a beating from the critics but word of mouth was much more positive, especially when time had gone by. I wasn't blown away by either of them (except perhaps in terms of presentation) but I did enjoy them and would play bigger, more fleshed out sequels to both.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2076d ago
Show all comments (78)
350°

The Order: 1886 pushed visuals hard in 2015 - And still looks stunning today

Digital Foundry : Released in February 2015, The Order: 1886 was a stunning PlayStation 4 game at the cutting-edge of rendering technology, with visuals that still hold up today. The game's release pre-dated in-depth Digital Foundry coverage, something we're looking to address with this new video! Ready at Dawn's game never received a sequel and never received a PS4 Pro upgrade, but thanks to developments with exploited, older firmware PS5 consoles, we can now show you the game running locked at 60 frames per second.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
VenomUK258d ago

The gameplay was bland and extremely frustrating at times with unnecessary QTE combat at points. But the world and the lore and the characters and the story were fantastic. I’ve always wanted a sequel. I still hope Sony will surprise us one day.

shadowT259d ago

Sony missed the opportunity to acquire Ready at Dawn Studios.

Tacoboto259d ago

But... Sony didn't want Ready at Dawn. Clearly

mkis007258d ago

I'm guessing had 1886 turned out more positively they would have.

RaidenBlack259d ago

And let's not forget,
Ready At Dawn showcased The Order 1886 running on PC at 60fps at SIGGRAPH 2015
https://www.dsogaming.com/n...

isarai259d ago

I still stand by my theory that this game just released at the wrong time. Almost every outlet spent a lot of time in their reviews ragging on the game for not being an online experience, everyone was in the Destiny hype train and at the time they wanted EVERY game to follow suit, bashing any game that didn't. If this were released after everyone realized how much that wasn't future, people would've appreciated it more. I loved it, and I'm always disappointed that we'll never get a sequel

Tacoboto259d ago

That doesn't seem to be true about outlets complaining on the lack of online. The review summaries on Metacritic are very consistent: Amazing graphics, but shallow gameplay and a very short length with little reason to return.

Here's an example of how *little* time IGN spent talking about multiplayer:

"With no multiplayer, and no reason to revisit the short and stunted single-player campaign once it’s been completed, there just isn’t a lot to it."

It's the final sentence. They don't even take the time to say "online multiplayer"

MrChow666259d ago (Edited 259d ago )

"Amazing graphics, but shallow gameplay and a very short length with little reason to return."
You are right, that's what everbody was saying at the time, never heard anything about it not being online.
I've been thinking about trying this game for years, I may get it now that it's dirt cheap, no big loss if it sucks

MrChow666259d ago

Oh, add to that bad enemy AI, I remember that from the reviews, I saw a video of a wherewolf boss fight with a very weak AI

thorstein259d ago

And there we glowing reviews for shorter games. It was one of the times where hating this game was "cool."

CrimsonWing69259d ago

Can you show me the reviews that rag on it for not having an online experience?

I’m not doubting you or anything. I’m just being lazy.

isarai259d ago

Sorry, not multiplayer, open world is what I meant.

Tacoboto259d ago

That's also fake news, isarai. Again, the game was consistently criticized for what it was (Pretty but extremely short, extremely linear, hand-holding, no replayability), not for what it wasn't (multiplayer/open-world)

isarai259d ago

Nope, every review uses the term "linear" several times as if it's some inherently bad attribute. Not fake news at all. Since then there's veen plenty of short and sweet single player linear games that get lots of praise, again after the reality of everything being open world set it and it wasn't as great as everyone thought. But at the launch of the last gen everyone had open world fever, and especially the first couple years "linear" was a con in many games reviewed

Tacoboto259d ago

That's your own contortion assuming criticism of its extremely linear design is suddenly a call for it to have been open world.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 259d ago
zumlauf14259d ago

You totally made up a claim regarding an overall review consensus that isn't true. And, instead of just ignoring being called out for it, you respond with "oh actually i ment to say OPEN WORLD". Which literally isn't true either. You can't show us one review that bashed the game for "not being open world". And, somehow the other guy is getting downvoted. Over a bullshit liar.

isarai259d ago

Games were being criticized at that time for any game that wasn't open world or online. So yeah I got one mixed for the other, doesn't change my argument one bit that it would've been received better if it released later. People are agreeing because if you were not riding the "online and open world" hype train at that time, it was blatantly obvious there were biases in play for how games were criticized. Now after all that has happened since people want to say "oh wait these games were actually pretty good" cause they know better now

Rude-ro259d ago

The gameplay was very shallow and when one says repetitive, it is by the very definition for some fights. As in, completely identical but different setting.

The game has amazing potential.
The graphics, the lore, characters…
This could most definitely have been all corrected with a sequel and became a franchise hit…
Still would love to see an attempt.

Ie fantastic premise and moments that shine…
But it had its downfalls that deserved the negative marks.

thorstein259d ago

It was the "game to hate" when it launched. And right here, on this site, we saw people posting stories that were outright fabrications about the game. It was weird. The game launched, it was fun, a really cool game but the hate was too much. And so were the lies.

Minute Man 721259d ago

It was just too short....but I loved every minute of it....double dipped and grabbed the ultimate CE

babadivad258d ago

That isn't true. I remember people talking about how incredibly short it was and the somewhat janky gunplay.

KwietStorm_BLM258d ago

First I'm hearing of this. I don't know what multiplayer has to do with anything. The game was just dull. Amazing graphics, great narrative, great lore, boring gameplay sprinkled in pieces between cutscenes, and lackluster AI and controls.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 258d ago
anast259d ago

People cried this game was too short. No people are crying because games are too long.

isarai259d ago

Pretty sure everyone is complaining about bloated games lately but ok

anast259d ago

Thank you for the ok. I needed that.

RaidenBlack259d ago

Games like Ubisoft open worlds not enjoyable lengthy games like Elden Ring or Baldur's Gate III

anast259d ago

I get it, but people also complain about the main stories being too long or just games being too long in general because they are "adults".

Show all comments (50)
230°

The Curious Case of The Order: 1886 - A Retrospective

Ready At Dawn cut their teeth developing spin-offs for PlayStation Portable and porting games to consoles. When they got a chance to establish their own with The Order: 1886, its poor critical reception ostensibly halted their trajectory. Can one middling game really sully one’s reputation in the eyes of Sony?

Read Full Story >>
lordsofgaming.net
moriarty1889725d ago

Wanted a sequel for this game so much. It was left wide open for one with the ending it had.

porkChop725d ago

Sony did file a new trademark a while back, so you never know. Though if I were to guess it would be a reboot rather than a sequel.

REDGUM725d ago

The Order was great from my playthrough and really enjoyed it. The same with Days Gone. Both, amongst others out there, deserve a follow-up. Anyone who actually played through the complete games knows there were hidden gems in and around these 2 games. Too many out there put too much faith in reviewer's opinions instead of thier own and get put off or join the hate bandwagon.
Seriously, gamers need to game & not read or view other people game with added opinions thrown in.
Honestly, if you haven't played either of these 2 games yet, do yourself a favour, pick it or them up, forget anything you know about them & just play it for yourself & create you're own opinions.

Ninver724d ago

I ignored the reviews and went straight to the store to but the game. Thoroughly enjoyed it I might add. If only Sony had the balls to summon enough faith to reboot or give us a sequel. Maybe even a prequel done right and make it a 3 part series. Wasted opportunity for a really different exclusive if you ask me.

barom724d ago

Days Gone is really an exceptional game though it feels like it took a bit of time for it to get interesting.

The Order 1886 was unfortunately not very good. Super beautiful game with beautiful cinematics but felt incomplete and don't really remember much happening at all in the game i.e. it was kind of bland. A sequel where they learned from their mistakes would be very intriguing though and I would have bought it.

monkey602724d ago

I loved Days Gone and I would have loved a sequel.

I didnt like The Order. There was enough there for me to give a sequel a chance if they improved on bits but I'm losing no sleep over the absence of it. I thought the 1st one was genuinely terrible for a multitude of valid reasons.

S2Killinit725d ago

I really enjoyed it. I was hoping for a game in the same world but less linear. With lots of that sweet lore.

YoungKingDoran725d ago

Yeah with the tech sorted and expanding on the existing assets, they could/should have been able to do a trilogy that gen. What happened..

moriarty1889724d ago

Agreed. Such an interesting title just abandoned. Makes no sense. As I said the ending of the game sets up for a sequel perfectly.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 724d ago
porkChop725d ago

Incredible graphics and presentation. Great use of photo mode. A really interesting premise. The actual gunplay felt solid. The game just needed to be longer, and the levels could have been a bit less constrained. More enemy variety as well. At full price it just didn't have the value, at least in my opinion.

I would like to see a sequel or reboot, which I think is more likely. It would need to be a new dev as Ready at Dawn are part of Oculus now

robtion725d ago

I think Bluepoint could do a good job. They have the technical capability if Demon's Souls is anything to go by.

MeatyUrologist725d ago

Agreed. Because of all the bad reviews I waited until the end of last gen to buy it, but was really surprised. The only knocks against it were length and linearity. Really loved the visuals, atmosphere, story, and characters. The gunplay was actually really well done with unique and fun weapons.

You mentioned the photo mode, and this was one of the best examples I have seen. They actually allow you to add filters and modify the visuals in the photo mode, and then apply those to the game. I have never seen that before or since. I really wish more games would allow this. Give the users more control over how the game looks to cater it to their tastes.

uth11725d ago

This was a weird one in that the community hated the game but also demanded a sequel

SonyStyled725d ago

Because it’s literally a 5 hr game, yet had the same quality offering of the other AAA Sony games that are tens to hundreds of hours of gameplay.

I used a walkthrough trophy guide for the platinum to not miss any collectibles in one run, it took 8hrs. I thought it was actually a pretty great game, but always wonder why that level of game development didn’t continue for a 15hr single player campaign.

robtion725d ago

I'm part of the community and I loved it.

I think a lot of the hate was from people who didn't even play it jumping on the bandwagon. Clearly there was the usual hate from xbox fans but also from insecure PC players as the graphics were (still are) phenomenal.
The game is a flawed gem. A new entry on PS5 would have great potential (doubt it will happen though, Sony isn't into risk taking these days).

Eidolon725d ago

All the early hate was a people who haven't played it and were quick to call it a QTE game.

AuraAbjure725d ago

I'm an Xbox fan and I'm planning on getting a PS4 pro one day to play this game along with gravity Rush 2 and others.

coolbeans724d ago

-"I think a lot of the hate was from people who didn't even play it jumping on the bandwagon."

Can we please stop retreating back such tired defenses? It's had a heavily mixed reception ever since critics PLAYED the game back then, and justifiably so. Even trying to rope in "insecure PC players" just shows how shallow this view actually is.

725d ago
Shiore2u725d ago (Edited 725d ago )

Can't ever forget those terribly designed lycan fights.

ClayRules2012724d ago

Ugh, I love this game! But yes, those lycan fights were terribly designed, for real.

Overall though, solid gameplay.

Show all comments (37)
540°

Sony Files A New Trademark For The Order: 1886

The Order: 1886 has received a new trademark filed by Sony. The trademark application is for a video game, implying that they want to extend it.

Read Full Story >>
novicegamerguides.com
zsquaresoff860d ago

I hope they give this game another chance, it had an incredible story and gameplay, It was just unfortunate that the game length was extremely short.

Magog860d ago

The team that made it was bought by Facebook. I don't see why they would continue the series with a new team rather than just make a new IP.

Neonridr860d ago

I guess it's still possible that another studio could take another swing at it. But yeah, Ready at Dawn was bought by Facebook.

darthv72860d ago

would be cool to see an oculus version.

CrimsonWing69860d ago

It wouldn't be the first time this has happened. Bungie and 343 come to mind with Halo.

Magog860d ago

@CrimsonWing69 the difference is Halo was still successful. In my mind they should have put the series to rest when the original creators got tired of it but Microsoft love to flog the series so there you go.

ALMGNOON860d ago

am pretty sure Sony owns the IP so that doesn't matter at all.

GamingSinceForever860d ago

So what other great games has that studio produced since being bought by Facebook?

Magog860d ago

@GamingSinceForever they made Lone Echo a well received VR game.

Lord_Sloth859d ago

The team was, but that doesn't mean all of them left Sony. It's entirely possible that several of the employees still work for Sony.

Rhythmattic859d ago (Edited 859d ago )

"The team that made it was bought by Facebook."
Yes.. Not the IP...
Personally, The IP has soooo much potential for exploration.......If done right.....
Which brings me to your post... Unlike FB... Sorry, Meta.... A team is not IP, and with an even better team working on such said IP, It could be a winner...

Def wont be 1886 infinite,

deleted859d ago

Exactly @Rhythmattic Could you imagine if The Order was handed over to a studio like Santa Monica?! The Order 1886 set up a really nice setting and lore... now the idea could be pushed to the next level by one of Sony's high tier studios. It may be too much to ask to get one of the big dogs on it, but one can dream.

It could even work out that someone like Santa Monica create a smaller team just for creative vision, then hand over the busy work of building that world to one of their subsidiaries like the newly acquired Valkyrie Entertainment, which specializes in high tier support work.

Magog859d ago (Edited 859d ago )

@Lord_Sloth Readyatdawn were never owned by Sony so no, none of their employees stayed with Sony. Order 1886 was a second party game funded by Sony but developed by an outside company.

Neonridr859d ago

@GamingSinceForever - Lone Echo and its sequel are some of the better VR games out there with a great story and some awesome VR integration. The second game only came out in October of this year, so it will be some time before we see their next project.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 859d ago
_SilverHawk_860d ago

Hopefully playstation-5 will have a sequel to the order 1886.

FlavorLav01860d ago

Please let one of the big boys take a swing at it and slay us with an awesome game. Naughty Dog, Sucker Punch, Sony Santa Monica, and Sony Bend could all do this IP justice.

Magog860d ago

Why would any of Sony's teams want to take their time and resources to work on another studios unsuccessful IP instead of their own unique ideas? Generally speaking Sony doesn't assign their top teams games to make they let them make what they want and are passionate about.

senorfartcushion859d ago

It’ll be just to hold on to the rights. They’re not making a new one. A remaster in 5 years is most likely, but until then, no.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 859d ago
FlavorLav01860d ago

If it had been marketed correctly as a strong narrative experience and sold for $30-40 instead of full price, the game would’ve big a huge success and we’d have guaranteed sequels. Loved the game, hope more from this IP is on the way.

Rhythmattic859d ago

It def cut corners though.. The Wolf fights where copy and pasted, the gun mechanics, decent... But the World was what made it... Maybe your standard gun mechanics, but never the guns....

The round table needs to be fleshed out....

ChasterMies860d ago (Edited 860d ago )

Short games are ok with me. Everyone loves the Titanfall 2 campaign and it was only about 5 hours. The issue is gameplay, and frustrating controls that did not need to be frustrating. Other than that, the look and feel was fantastic.

porkChop860d ago

Titanfall 2 also had an excellent multiplayer mode though. As excellent as the campaign was, no one would have paid full price for just that.

Ramboforlife860d ago

Totally agree. If it was a 20-30 hour campaign, it would have sold very well. It deserves another chance.

Livingthedream860d ago

Nah it had mediocre to terrible reviews. Don’t really know anyone who actually loved the game, but there was potential. They should give it another go same studio. Lol

Rude-ro860d ago

This is not that type of game.
I can not think of a single story driven game that does not have endless fetch quests in a forced open world type game that comes close to 20 hours.

Let’s be realistic…
Either way, the game had issues that can easily be remedied and make for an amazing sequel and I hope it happens.

senorfartcushion859d ago

It was good but had a terrible
Cliffhanger. An actual second half would have skyrocketed the game’s status. TLOU 2 was over 30 hours long for some people.

porkChop860d ago

It really just needed to be twice as long. I can put up with super linear, tightly scripted gameplay as long as I feel like I'm getting my money's worth. But the game was so short with little replay value. And the length prevented the lore from being properly realized.

I'm interested as long as they can flesh out the length. Possibly open up the gameplay slightly without detracting from the movie-like scripting.

-Foxtrot860d ago

Yeah I really liked the overall world and Sir Galahad

(SPOILERS)

Having Werewolves and then vampires opened it up to so many possibilities, who's to say other mythical beasts couldn't be introduced.

EmperorDalek859d ago

The story was good until it ended on a cliff hanger, I wouldn't call it incredible. The gameplay was dreadful. I would like to see an improved sequel however.

itsmebryan859d ago

@zsquare

Maybe I'm missing something but, wasn't that game panned after much hype as not very good and poor gameplay? Metacritic is 63% and user rating of 6.7 and by no means consider a hit.
Actually a new developer could be good for the game.

Flewid638859d ago

Limited gameplay mechanics too but I REALLY enjoyed what was there.

alb1899859d ago

Yep, I always liked the atmosphere and characters of this game. I think it can be a really good game if they put emphasis on the gameplay.

DarXyde859d ago (Edited 859d ago )

I don't know if I would say the gameplay was "incredible." The lore was fine and the weapons were awesome (and truly a standout visually, no questions asked). I'm impressed they got a game looking this good to run in such a stable condition when you consider the tech last gen. I only played it on base PS4, and that was really a marvel.

But that all said, the gameplay didn't stand out for me at all. Felt like a pretty standard affair and, as you said, the length was pretty short. Granted, I got it on sale for $12, so I don't feel bad about that purchase. It didn't really linger so the point was really to tell the story they wanted to tell, which I can respect.

I also hope they give it another chance, but I would prefer if they really made it stand out. There's a ton of creative talent over at PlayStation, so if Ready at Dawn had learned from the shortcomings of the first game and they're willing to solicit feedback from PlayStation studios, it has great potential.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 859d ago
NovusTerminus860d ago (Edited 860d ago )

I really want another one, I bought it day one zero regrets. I enjoyed it a lot and has lots of room for a sequel.

HOWEVER

USPTO policy is that a trademark only be updates with visual proof once every ten years after initial filing, and since the game is still for sale on the PlayStation Network it is likely just a paper work error that will be corrected so that they can continue selling the game digitally.

RaidenBlack860d ago

Yea ... I initially though this might be for a near-future res+fps boost and/or a PC port, paving way for 1887.

GhostofHorizon860d ago

It was a really good game but there was a ton of room for improvement all around. If they had another crack at it, it could be something special.

Eidolon859d ago

A lot of games before and since have made absolutely shameless attempts at making a great experience that ended up falling short. This game gets the worst of it because of hype. And it's actually has really good narrative and gameplay. Tell me one thing NOW that it did wrong that other games aren't doing. Tell me.

BenRC01859d ago

I really like it, bought the special edition years after release, expecting an average game but was very pleasantly surprised

Relientk77860d ago

I really liked the concept, but the game wasn't perfect. It definitely had some flaws. The graphics not being one, they were insane. The coolest guns in the game were only usable for a short period of time. I believe there were like 2 werewolf fights that were basically identical which people pointed out. I'd love for the series to get another shot.

masterfox860d ago

hope there is a sequel, first one was and still is stunning from every aspect, from gameplay, visuals , music, etc, you name it, it literally the whole game is realtime cgi!, imagine what a PS5 can do to it!

Show all comments (88)