I think hes complaining about the fact he prefers to play free playing football like Barca/MCFC/Arsenal style rather than counter attacking style of Real Madrid/West Ham (last team was an inside joke). He came to Chelsea thinking they were free flowing and to be fair until Jose joined thats what they were starting to be but unsuccessfully with players like Mata. But with Jose back its back to defensive play. He doesn't like it just like Mata didn't and he will probably be out the door like Mata come summer.
The only trouble with arsenal is attack is too slow and long winded.
As for Chelsea. They are a counter-attacking team, but also run midfield in alot of games. Torres should have gone ages ago. Not good enough regardless of scoring.
im glad at least someone else agrees on this site, i can't believe im getting hate from fellow chelsea fans because i critique torres
if he brought the same form from chelsea to any of the top 5 teams in the EPL he would have been on loan at the very least then sold a year later, so i guess you have to give chelsea credit for giving him so long to "find him slef"
"Chelsea aren't set up to play football, Chelsea are set up to counter-attack - a little bit like Real against Bayern.
"I don't know what we lacked. After scoring, we had the game in our hands. Maybe they wanted it more than we did."
In what way did he question tactics? If anything, he compared us to Real which is in no way a bad thing. Gotta love the media...
Arsenal would suit hazards style of play.
The only trouble with arsenal is attack is too slow and long winded.
As for Chelsea. They are a counter-attacking team, but also run midfield in alot of games. Torres should have gone ages ago. Not good enough regardless of scoring.