760°

Introducing Stadia from Google

The future of gaming has arrived. A new playground for every imagination. Introducing Stadia, an all-new gaming platform powered by the best of Google.

Jin_Sakai1862d ago (Edited 1862d ago )

What a horrible name.

roadkillers1862d ago

That’s what people said about Xbox and Wii

Razmiran1862d ago

And they were not wrong

naruga1862d ago (Edited 1862d ago )

i will never support any non-physical gaming platform ...for me is a NO even before i see what it plays......also ive said it multiple times and i will say it once more ----we need to see what support they will get from Japan ....Because No Japan (games) =No party =DOA

DrumBeat1862d ago (Edited 1862d ago )

I thought 'PlayStation' sounded corny when it debuted and I was thirteen, but I didn't really care because I was so wowed by the graphics, the discs, and Twisted Metal that it really didn't bother me.

We were so used to Nintendo and Sega that anything else at the time sounded silly to us.

1862d ago
Razmiran1862d ago

Playstation sounds pretty stupid too
Switch is a good name. Dreamcast was top name in my books tho

RacerX1862d ago

Oh yeah, Xbox is a terrible name, but the "piss 4" was perfect.... SMH.

1862d ago
+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 1862d ago
SuperSonic911862d ago (Edited 1862d ago )

I always dreamed of a unifying platform and I thought it was Android but looks like its gonna be Stadia.

What's interesting is that YouTube to Stadia gaming connection which lets you play or join a game you see on YouTube. Now that is cool.
Also they are bringing couch co-op to the spotlight again via wi-fi.
Oh yeah, no one is gonna bitch about cross play again coz its there on the get go.

SuperSonic911861d ago (Edited 1861d ago )

@ the close minded fanatics below esp EddieNX

Really?
You guys are mentally ill fanatics
A unified gaming platform is a developer's dream so their games get discovered and played by as many people-gamers or non gamers.

Your negative and close minded mental illness is amazing!

I always appreciate the latest, the greatest and the best and give new start ups the benefit of the doubt.
Thanks for exposing yourselves.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1861d ago
rainslacker1862d ago

I question the appeal of showing some of the most annoying streamers or video chat hosts/players available to make it seem like it'd be cool to play with them and you'd somehow be in some sort of cool club by doing so.

But, then I remembered, Sony actually had this as a prominent feature of the PS4 early marketing. They didn't so much push the idea of tuning in to streamers and connecting to the games that way, although it was possible. They instead, made it where anyone could stream, and become one of these people, and build their own social circle around gaming.

I'd say early on, that idea actually had traction, as was evidenced by the rather high number of PS cameras that sold with the first year or two of the PS4. I don't know where it stands now for Sony, because they don't really talk about it, but I think a lot of people forget that Sony itself targeted that segment of the market to be a core feature of the system.

Google has some new ideas for this, and they're not bad ideas overall, but them being an all streaming service means I'm pretty much not part of their market. PS4 had the base hardware, and I have ignored all the streaming stuff, outside some share plays with friends, so it remained an option, which appears to be well integrated and utilized by the user base. It will be interesting to see if Google can make it into more, but I think being able to leverage YouTube will help them a lot. Sony managed to do it with Twitch, but YouTube is a much more known and watched site overall, and it opens up a lot of business opportunities for Google, and the streamers themselves...for better or worse.

Cobra9511862d ago

"Stadia" is actually the plural form of "stadium". For what it's worth. i wonder if they even considered that when they came up with the name.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1861d ago
darthv721862d ago (Edited 1862d ago )

Watching the demo go from chrome book to android phone to desktop to android tablet and finally tv using the chromecast was neat.

Stadia has 10.7tf of power built by AMD. Guess they are getting serious about competing with Sony and MS.

THC CELL1862d ago ShowReplies(6)
gamer78041862d ago

its streaming only, so its not really competing with xbox and playstation as a whole, only their streaming services xcloud and PSnow

AngelicIceDiamond1862d ago

Thats what I was thinkin. Its a virtual console. After what, 7, 8 years of speculation its a virtual streaming console. Noe exactly a threat tbh.

savedsynner1862d ago

Exactly and like every game service/console before it, it's about the games games games. Make or host good games, you'll do well. Google has enough money to really push this so it'll be interesting if Sony/Microsoft pull an old school nintendo and make developers/publishers sign exclusive contracts for non exclusive games.

demonicale1862d ago

Are you honestly that dumb?!

ravinash1862d ago

If Playstation and Xbox keep making exclusives, then they should be fine.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1862d ago
SegaGamer1862d ago

It's neat, but it wasn't running on your average internet connection. I highly doubt it will be that simple for everybody.

darthv721862d ago (Edited 1862d ago )

pretty much all of these on stage demos never run over real world internet connections. It's all controlled environments. Like the CD3 cloud demo was running on a direct link to a Ms data center for the cloud assisted physics.

Generally, companies always try to showcase their demos in the best possible light. Sony and Nintendo (when they did stage demos) do the exact same thing.

MatrixxGT1862d ago

Living in a area where my only option is lte hotspot or satellite these streaming devices are not my future.

Cobra9511862d ago

It won't be. From what I gathered earlier, even the best-case scenario will see latencies above 166 ms. That would make it a minimum of 10 frames of lag at 60 fps.

DeadlyFire1862d ago

More than likely ps5 and Xb4 will be comparable or better than 10 Tflops. Honestly the reason it is 10 Tflops probably has more to do with being able to port ps5 and xb4 titles to the platform.

Emme1862d ago

I dont get it, what exactly has 10 tf power ? Its streaming from servers, so what device has 10 tf and why should I as end consumer bother ?

Heavenly King1861d ago

All of that power does not matter. Because all is streamed!!

It all comes down to internet speed; and nothing else.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1861d ago
italiangamer1862d ago

One of the most cringy video I have ever seen.

gamer78041862d ago

google is good at coding and maths, but honestly they can't design well at all. Gmail interface looks terrible, the stadia controller looks awful, the one good thing about android is that you can customize it so it doesn't look like google...

darthv721862d ago

the controller is a mix of xbo and ds4 so it can't be all that bad.

Nyxus1862d ago

"The future of gaming has arrived."

Stop making threats please.

pcz1862d ago (Edited 1862d ago )

It is an inevitable future which all console manufactures (and consumers) have been inching closer towards each generation.

the future will be with no console, no physical one. no physical games etc. all streaming

Sirk7x1862d ago

Glasses with AR and VR, voice commanded. "Launch game, controller setup 1." Bam, virtual controller materializes in your hand and a screen appears in front of your face. Or, "VR activate", and your VR OS/hub launches from there. Technology is going to be insane in twenty years.

rainslacker1862d ago (Edited 1862d ago )

Its a part of the future, and there is a market for it. It's getting a bit tiresome as a console gamer....and I even assume for PC gamers....to keep being told what the future of gaming is, as if it's some sort of absolute, one to rule them all, kind of thing.

There are lots of markets in gaming, and just like mobile devices not ending up being the future at large, neither will streaming. Just another option, which has it's pros and cons, and it's own market, some of which is shared with other markets. Some publishers will chase after it at the expense of other markets, others will avoid it or wait for it to become more proven. Customers will go on as they did, and the market will ebb and flow like it always has. I remember a time when PC gaming was dead, and it managed to rise from the ashes....mostly due to Steam. Or when console gaming was dead, but it rose from the dead....mostly because of Nintendo. Or how Single player is dead....but it's making a come back....mostly due to Sony and Nintendo.

So on and so forth. If we listened to what was the future, and took it at face value, and just accepted fate, then we wouldn't even have anything anymore.

Wanna know who will be most successful going forward? The one who still has a console, when everyone else has decided to abandon that market for greener pastures. While they all battle it out on the service front, the one that has a monopoly on the market that obviously exists because it's growing every year, will be very happy to have all those customers, and publishers aren't going to ignore 100 million plus gamers. They may still use those sub services, but our money is more important to them than where we play our games.

pcz1861d ago

Ok, physical console gaming will exist, but only as a retro, extremely niche market for people who got left behind and are lost in nostalgia.

Millennials already view compact discs as retro technology. Blu-ray and any disk based medium will essentially be beta max- obsolete.

but yes, your argument stands, there will always be those who cling onto obsolete tech.

rainslacker1861d ago

I think its too soon to call the end of consoles based on these services, when these services haven't yet even shown they are a major part of the market. Google hasn't proven themselves. MS hasn't even released anything yet. Sony's own service has no evidence that it's wildly successful. Prior attempts at such things haven't done that well.

The streaming market has to prove itself before it can be said to be the end of consoles. Even mobile games proved themselves before they were the end of consoles....and look how that turned out.

timotim1862d ago

The future of gaming by Google...filled to privacy leaks, data tracking and ads...no thank you.

vega2751862d ago

I get this strange feeling like Google will pull a Epic on us and buy exclusivity for a year. But yeah I don't want ad filled games and my personal info auctioned off to advertisers to bombard me with stuff I don't want

demonicale1862d ago

Of course Sony and Microsoft haven't had them right?

timotim1862d ago

Google as a company makes their living off of selling your data to other companies and businesses. They are a ad, information and search company by nature. This will be a totally online service that it heavily integrated with YouTube...they are talking about making it as easy as clicking on a link to play a game...the way they get content to its users will be through ads...click on a link in an ad and play a game....click on a link in an ad and watch a stream, etc...

Show all comments (122)
70°

The INDIE Live Expo 2024 event is to feature over 100 game titles

INDIE Live Expo, Japan’s premiere online digital showcase series , will debut never-before-seen games & content updates across more than 100 titles on May 25th.

140°

PlayStation Doesn't Need a Dedicated PC Store Launcher

With all the PlayStation games that are now coming to PC, is it time for Sony to release a dedicated PC launcher?

thorstein3d ago

No, and they already solved any need with the overlay that's coming.

Vits3d ago

Unless they are trying to kill their recently created PC business, I would advise against opening a dedicated PC store. It's an extremely hard endeavor, and people, in general, are very comfortable with Steam. Even Epic, with their billions of dollars invested, is still struggling to find a foothold, and they have Fortnite.

just_looken2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Money is one thing security is another but again millions have 0 knowledge past 2020.

Epic store for years struggled with a shopping cart/account theft/credit card theft

Rockstar launcher/store to this day over 5 years later still has horrific user interface security flaws lost account's and stolen CC

Then you got that activision need phone number oh we lost it launcher

The crown jewel is the ea launcher/store ea app 3 yrs old still has hundreds of threads were people lost games/accounts/game access or just straight up crashes.

Edit" Oh ubi launcher were you buy a game that may or may not be there again or work and the launcher 5yrs old still has no 4K support if you launch it on a 4k screen there is a high chance it will just crash.

ocelot073d ago

Can tell who ever put this together is not all that clued up on pc gaming.

It's just a known fact. The PC gaming community prefer Steam and Steam alone. They don't like different launchers. I personally don't mind them. But majority just stick with steam. Hence why EA and Ubisoft went back to on releasing on steam and why Microsoft release games on steam as people hated buying from the windows store.

The only other launchers that I imagine are doing ok is GOG due to being drm free and epic games due to the free games every week. Sony shouldn't release any sort of pc launcher n

Nitrowolf23d ago (Edited 3d ago )

It literally says in the OP that PC gamers don't like multiple launchers lol. It even mentions Steam being the go to for gamers

Tacoboto2d ago

Title: "PlayStation Doesn't Need a Dedicated PC Store Launcher"

N4G: "Can tell who ever put this together is not all that clued up on pc gaming"

When you don't even read the headline...

ocelot072d ago

I read it and had a brain fart. As read the title then this "With all the PlayStation games that are now coming to PC, is it time for Sony to release a dedicated PC launcher?"

So I hold my hands up on that mistake. Rest of my comment still stands.

Giblet_Head2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Steam and GOG are highly preferred because of the rich feature set. Ubisoft, Rockstar, EA, Epic etc have all set a precedent over the years for customers to instinctively expect individual publisher launchers to be so extremely half-assed that the majority simply don't want to bother dealing with what is almost an inevitable disappointment by comparison to Steam or GOG. Those publishers and their inaction or general disinterest to improve have effectively ruined any future adoption to be taken seriously.

Einhander19723d ago (Edited 3d ago )

This is just another ridiculous double standard article.

It's like how Microsoft can spend 20 years of making nothing but gaas and live service style games to sell microtransactions, dlc and subscriptions and get praise for doing it, but if Sony wants to make a single game like that every website under the sun is writing articles saying how Sony is anti-consumer or whatever.

derek2d ago

Yep, huge double standard look at the tortured reaction to the ps5pro, websites hyperventilating like Sony is forcing people to buy it.

just_looken2d ago

Wait my xbox from 2004 has avengers gaas on it? wow your so smart

m$ Gaas started with the other companies like sony

Gamepass yes they are deep into that but its still a huge money saver sense you do not own your games then get a service like that.

Now there pc xbox launcher that is trash for years now

Show all comments (15)
90°

German Computer Game Awards 2024 has just announced its winners

"The best games of the year and the creative teams behind them were in the spotlight at the grand award ceremony of the German Computer Game Award 2024." - German Computer Game Awards.

anast3d ago

BG3 has won everything possible. It's insane.

TGG_overlord3d ago

That's right, well, BG3 deserved it imo.

anast3d ago

It's definitely a game of the generation if not all time.

InUrFoxHole3d ago

Sure buddy... You're trying to tell me it has a deeper story than goat 🐐 simulator 4000?!?!?. I wanna give bg3 a shot but my brain is burnt out on long games