680°

Is a PlayStation Game Pass Viable?

Could Sony realistically mirror Microsoft's popular endeavour?

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
CaptainCook1682d ago

No. Xbox Game Pass Ultimate includes Xbox Live Gold and PC Game Pass for only $14,99 per month, it can be about $60 for 12 months when on sale.

lxeasy1682d ago (Edited 1682d ago )

I don't know how Sony could replicate this because I doubt they want to put their games on PC. At the end of the day you get the choice to play your games on two platform with the Gamepass. and on top of that that It all goes down to if Sony wants to continue to charge gamer's $60 to play their games.

NarutoFox1682d ago

Didn't Sony just start publishing games on PC? Not to mention you can already play some of Playstation games on PC with PSNOW

AngelicIceDiamond1682d ago

@Ieasy I can easily see Sony doing this if MS is successful at it. Unfortunately PSNOW needs a major re-haul in which I think they will re-haul it. Calling it now PS event in Feb. They'll talk about PS5 details and a new PSNOW service. Sony announced that games will be on PC. So far it seems Sony will publish certain games that will be made on PC and possible release on PS as well.

rainslacker1682d ago

I wouldn't care so long as they retain the equity of their premier 1st party heavy hitters.

Question is, would sony feel they need to do it to compete, and would they possibly make less in the bigger picture if people weren't buying as many games.

Having more robust numbers from MS game pass would make it easier to consider if itd be good for Sony, but even then, it's up to sony to decide

S2Killinit1682d ago (Edited 1682d ago )

I dont think losing their quality first party in order to put them ona streaming service would be a smart move, but if they wanted to, it would be just as easy to achieve as it is for MS.

Forn1682d ago

I honestly don't see how Game Pass is viable for Microsoft honestly. It's basically Netflix, and Netflix is hundreds of millions (if not billions) of dollars in debt. It feels like something that will eventually implode on itself.

1682d ago
The Wood1682d ago

Judging by the gears numbers I'm not sure how sustainable game pass is. You need a high number of subscribers for the game providers to get proper payback.

agnosticgamer1682d ago

They don't need to put their games on PC. It could simply be an option for the console.

ABizzel11682d ago

Sony and Nintendo can make a direct competitor to GamePass, but neither company wants to because Sony's exclusives help define their console, and Nintendo's exclusives completely define their console.

Xbox as of late has been 1 AAA game (Halo, Forza, Gears), a few AA games, and a few indies per year. Gamepass provides 3rd party games gamers would play, but wouldn't spend money on, plus Xbox first-party which outside of the AAA most of their gamers wouldn't spend money on. So GamePass for Xbox is an easy sale for MS and their gamers. Especially having the lower install base.

Sony and Nintendo know their exclusives will do well because Sony's exclusives generally break 1 million in sales, which means most of their games break even and then go on to make a profit and Nintendo budgets are way less for their games so they generally only need to sell a few hundred thousand to break even. And considering both platforms are selling extremely well and both platforms are doing well in software, there is no reason for either company to cut into the millions their exclusives make to hand them out for free.

However, if Sony really wanted to compete they could simple update PS+, to add more games and include a PSNow option. Have PS+ cost $60 / $4.99/mo on PS5 and offer 2 PS4 games, 2 PSVR games, and 1 - 2 PS5 games, but also have a $100 / $9.99/mo offer that gives PS+ and PSNow and fill the PSNow library with PS4 / PSVR / PS3 / PS2 / PS1 / PSP / PSV games and the occasional PS5 games with PS5 early access and other features. That would be Sony's competitor.

Nintendo is behind on the feature / online aspects of gaming, but if they can expand on their current SNES offering to include best of Wii U, Wii, GameCube, N64, SNES, NES, 3DS, DS, GBA, GB then they could have something as well by giving new life to those games and adding multiplayer features to games that didn't have them before.

Obscure_Observer1682d ago

@rainslacker

"I wouldn't care so long as they retain the equity of their premier 1st party heavy hitters."

But you said it wouldn´t be possible for Microsoft due Gamepass service model. How it would be possible for Sony?

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 1682d ago
1682d ago Replies(7)
isarai1682d ago

What's the difference? You pay a sub fee, you get access to games

lxeasy1682d ago

Psnow is not as good as Gamepass, Stop pretending like it is

isarai1682d ago (Edited 1682d ago )

Didn't say it was or wasn't, don't put words in my mouth.

Kran1682d ago

No it's not.

But it's the same thing except with streaming (though some you can download). You pay a subscription and have a huge choice of games. LITERALLY LIKE XBOX GAME PASS.

Silly gameAr1682d ago

Stop pretending that Gamepass is some innovative feature. MS pretty much had to implement something like gamepass, or they would have been left in the dust this gen.

King_Noctis1682d ago

“Didn't say it was or wasn't, don't put words in my mouth.”

That is why people request for Gamepass-like service on PS4.

“Stop pretending that Gamepass is some innovative feature. ”

Umm who say it is? And who say it need to be innovative?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1682d ago
DaDrunkenJester1682d ago

No, as in GamePass where 1st party games launch day and date on the service.

isarai1682d ago (Edited 1682d ago )

Why would they do that when their games sell amazingly well on their own? Not saying it wouldn't be cool, but it doesn't make sense when they've never had issues getting their games out there.

DaDrunkenJester1682d ago

Because it means they could get subscription money on games that people wouldn't have bought at full price or even $30.

xX-oldboy-Xx1682d ago

Thats doesn't sound very genuine for a company to do that. Make people pay for a subscription for sub par games they wouldn't normally buy under the guise of - Day 1 1st party games.

And don't forget most of the 1st party stuff has been shovelware.

I do hope people wake up to ms's tactics, take the blinkers off you lot.

DaDrunkenJester1682d ago

@Oldboy

Shovelware? lol I shouldn't even bother responding to this comment. Just because a game doesn't hit the precious 8+ or it's a game you don't like.. doesn't make it shovelware.

Knushwood Butt1682d ago

What's the GamePass lineup for the next 12 months?

ThankYouSir1682d ago

@Knushwood

Start with Gears 5? Then there is The Outer Worlds, Wasteland 3, Ori 2, Battletoads, Halo Infinite, Bleeding Edge, Minecraft Dungeons, Microsoft Flight simulator... and then I'm sure a bunch of 3rd party ranging from indies to games like DMCV and Metro Exodus...

CoinOrc1682d ago

Completely missed isarai’s point. People have no problem paying $60 for Sony’s numerous stellar exclusives. If they offer their exclusives day one on psnow, they would have to increase the price of psnow to make up the difference. MS have to offer Xbox game pass at such a low price because their exclusives line up has been mediocre.

xX-oldboy-Xx1682d ago

DaDrunken - Thank you for lowering your standards and replying. Fact is CD3 is shovelware, SoD2 is shovelware, SoT is shovelware - these are facts. Seems ms has given their subscribers less value than one would believe.

Knushwood Butt1682d ago

@ ThankYouSir

Thank you Sir.

I wonder how this will work with the Scarlett launch? The first party launch titles on gamepass with a couple of third party efforts on there too for some big cash in advance?

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 1682d ago
Magic_Spatula1682d ago

Both are similar in that you pay a service fee to play games but PSNow is mainly streaming the game with several titles being downloadable (not sure if all of them are) but Game Pass I believe does not have a streaming feature and all titles are downloadable to the hard drive. Not sure if Microsoft will be adding streaming games at a later date. Also, Games cycle in and out of Game Pass but I'm not sure if that's the case with PSNow since I haven't used it since the first few months it was released.

rainslacker1682d ago

All ps4 games can be downloaded to a ps4. Games do cycle in and out of psnow, but it doesn't seem to be as frequently as game pass. Overall, psnow has more games to choose from. For a while psnow had more downloadable ps4 games than game pass had total games. I dont know if that's still true or not.

crazyCoconuts1682d ago

I think you can download all the PS4 games. PS3 are stream only. PSNow could easily rival GamePass by giving away all their exclusives and running $1 specials, but that's probably not wise for them given the # of great exclusives they have that people are willing to pay full price for...

1682d ago
meka26111682d ago

Main thing they need to do with PSNow is to drop the price and then they could compete with gamepass. I like a lot of the games on PSNow but $20 a month is just way too damn much.

rainslacker1682d ago

A yearly sub of psnow is cheaper than the regular monthly plan from game pass. Dunno if MS has a yearly sub for game pass yet, but dont recall seeing it announced, not seen anyone state a price comparison between the two, so I'm thinking not.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1682d ago
NarutoFox1682d ago (Edited 1682d ago )

"Well, it’s worth mentioning that the mechanics of the model aren’t all that difficult to implement."

I don't really care for it. But if it happens it is what it is. Not going to change the way I game but it would give competition and overtake Xbox game pass because of Sony exclusives and third party support.

EddieNX 1682d ago (Edited 1682d ago )

Gamepass is incredible and has made me love my Xbox one X.
It will be a sad day if retail goes the way of the dinosaur , but tbh as long as I can play the games I want, I dont really care..

1682d ago Replies(1)
xX-oldboy-Xx1682d ago

EddieNX - That's a ridiculous, contradictory statement to make. You really don't know what's happening do you? Don't worry about dinosaurs - think Trojan Horse.

MarkyMark891682d ago

Let me guess its the cold war era still and the SSR still stands, fall off your Trojan Horse and come to 2019 bud. NOBODY CARES ABOUT PHYSICAL COPIES BESIDES SINGLE PLAYER PLEB LOVERS AND ALOT OF IDIOTS ON THIS WEBSITE... Remember when everybody said the digital era was going to kill music and kill profits for artist. I still see them driving around in a quarter of a million dollar luxury cars and tossing money out like grass clippings. But tell me more about how great a physical disc is, wtf am I going to due with it after 2 years when I stop playing the game? The entire product (physically) is just a waste of materials. But who cares right because the overlords are trying to control you. Lol you ppl are tools literally.

xX-oldboy-Xx1681d ago

MarkyMark89 - Do you think ms is happy selling 16,000 physical copies in the UK of G5? How does 3 million players over a 4 day launch period, where seemingly most of those are gamepass players - who've paid anywhere from $1 - $15 - how is that a good thing?

Now compare that to Spider-Man or God Of War - both selling 3+ million in their first 4 days on the market at $60. Who is better off?

That's where the profits are.

Let me tell you something bud, putting your games library in complete control of a company as shitty as ms - shows how much intelligence you possess. Next to none.

They can and drop games at a whim, and unless you've purchased them - bad luck. Why wouldn't you just buy it in the first place?

trooper_1682d ago

That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

EddieNX 1682d ago

It really does..

I'll break it down into chunks.

-Gamepass is incredible
-It's furthered the love for my Xbox
- services like Gamepass are inevitably going to compete with and replace retail.
-that will be sad
-but I'll be fine with it

Gravesinger_1682d ago

@EddieNX

don't try to reason with these $ony cuckboys, if $ony had come up with this first they would be all over it. Just enjoy your games and let the peasants peasant

madpuppy1682d ago

ignorant, unreasonably smug and a foul mouth...classy...

xX-oldboy-Xx1681d ago

madpuppy - sounds like a typical xbox fanboy to me, they really are a dim bunch.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1681d ago
zoramax1682d ago

Nope, most of Sony's exclusives are single player games so once you complete them you are done. You could pay $15 a month and complete them all in 2 months making Sony far less money. And you wouldn't need to renew.

MS's exclusives are usually MP focused so a player could be playing Gears for a year or more and their subscription will make up for not paying full price.

NarutoFox1682d ago (Edited 1682d ago )

"Nope, most of Sony's exclusives are single player games so once you complete them you are done"

Are we talking about PS3 or PS4 or just Sony exclusives in general?? Sony Single and multiplayer exclusives: Let's see The Last of us, Uncharted, Killzone, Grand Turismo Sport, Starhawk, Warhawk, SOCOM 4, Resistance, MAG, etc.)

Killzone: Shadow Fall

Driveclub

The Last of Us

Bloodborne

Uncharted 4: A Thief’s End

Knack 2

Gran Turismo Sport

Farpoint

Hidden Agenda

Yeah, I know. PlayStation has steered away from exclusive multiplayer games so much to provide us some amazing single-player experiences. The PS3 era had Gran Turismo, Warhawk/Starhawk, Resistance, Killzone, LittleBigPlanet, Motorstorm, Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots, Uncharted, MAG, The Last of Us, SOCOM, etc. Even amazing experiences in the PS2 era (the glorious SOCOM days).

zoramax1682d ago

Obviously Sony has MP games, what I am saying is most of their exclusives are played for the SP experience not MP.

Are you really telling me people are buying TLOF, U4, Bloodborne for MP, seriously? And yes I am talking PS4.

Nasdac1682d ago

Well Uncharted 4 MP was very fresh and Last of Us MP was phenomenal, not to mention the 16+ million sales. Gears in their best was around 5 million max so, no it's not the same. You don't get Gamepass for MP, you get it for their campaign plus most of the new own Xbox Studios are SP focused.

DaDrunkenJester1682d ago

Besides Sea of Thieves, what Xbox game is only MP? Just because there is a MP component doesn't mean its focus is MP.

zoramax1682d ago

It doesn't need to be MP only just MP focused. Halo, Gears, Forza Horzion, SoT all these games are focused on MP.

DaDrunkenJester1682d ago

@Zora

I would say that Gears/Halo were played just as much for their SP and Co-op modes as their online MP. Forza Horizon is hardly MP focused, but yeah SoT is definitely a MP game.

Ristul1682d ago

zoramax: Maybe to you, but I have always played Halo/Gears mostly for the campaign, funny that you try to infuse your preference onto others. Gamers buy games to have a good experience, be it multi- or single-player. I doubt you have even played Uncharted4/tLoU multiplayer, or you would know they were great and had huge player base.

Profchaos1682d ago

I play gears 5 for the story

xX-oldboy-Xx1682d ago

zoromax - No people are buying those for quality single player experiences, with the added bonus of good to amazing MP.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1682d ago
Show all comments (175)
210°

PlayStation beat Xbox cloud gaming users in 2021, new CMA data indicates

PlayStation dominated cloud gaming users throughout 2021, beating Microsoft's xCloud streaming by over 10%, but Xbox swings back at PlayStation in 2022.

Read Full Story >>
tweaktown.com
Nanukas441d ago

Good, i want sony to feel heat. Ordinary people win from good competition.

BehindTheRows441d ago

“Good competition” is not something Microsoft offers often. You should want THEM to feel enough heat to actually do better.

Nanukas441d ago (Edited 441d ago )

Agree. I wish sony would be more afraid of gamepass to get better games on ps+

Obscure_Observer441d ago (Edited 441d ago )

"You should want THEM to feel enough heat to actually do better."

Phil Spencer started to acquire studios back in 2018, after that, Xbox Studios only had 5 studios. Now Xbox has 23 almost 5x more studios. Not to mention third party exclusives like Flight Simulator, Contraband and Project Dragon.

Plus, unlike Sony, Xbox Studios won´t be distracted with things like VR, all of their first party efforts goes towards Xbox first and foremost.

Sony so can expect a much more robust Gamepass in terms of first party and third party exclusives games from Xbox from now on.

Since Sony have less studios and won´t release their games day one on PS+, they better make sure andl deliver high quality games like Ragnarok. Because so far, 2023 hadn´t started well for them with Forspoken.

https://www.videogameschron...

Sony spent millions to secure a AAA third party exclusive game build from the ground up for PS5, not to mention more millions spent on market to be outperformed by a AA game which costs less than half on Steam, had an EPIC day one surprise announcement AND release with ZERO money invested on promotion and marketing.

If that´s not good competition, I don´t know what it is.

BehindTheRows441d ago

@Obscure_Observer

It isn’t.

Obscure_Observer441d ago (Edited 441d ago )

"It isn’t."

Oh yes, it is. You can bet your life that both companies cares about their money and investments.

The simple fact that Sony continues to pay multiple publishers to keep games out of Xbox forever, is nothing but a reaction to Gamepass.

Imo, Sony now fears that once their timed-exclusive contracts ends, those games will be available on Gamepass the moment the said games hits the Xbox platforms.

Sony fears the scenario where gamers realize that it´s not worth to invest in every single game released on Playstation at full $70 once they´ll be getting it for "free" on Gamepass eventually, just like Yakuza, Dragon Quest, Octopath Traveler, Nino Kuni, Persona series and more.

ARK 2 (exclusive on Xbox consoles), S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2( exclusive on Xbox consoles), Flintlock, Wo Long, Atomic Hears, Lies of P, Eiyuden Chronicle, Hollow Knight: Silksong. Minecraft: Legends, MLB 23...

Those are just some of the games that Xbox players will be getting for "free" day one while Playstation gamers will have to pay for all of it.

So at least you´re rich or something, Xbox players will be getting way more NEW games to play than you. That´s just facts.

BehindTheRows441d ago (Edited 441d ago )

@Obscure_Observer

I can bet that one company brings actual competition, isn’t afraid to share losing numbers, and doesn’t buy huge publishers due to said weaknesses. That’s what I can bet.

As a fan of theirs, you should want them to do better and offer more than subscriptions services and unfulfilled promises.

tay8701441d ago (Edited 441d ago )

@obscure. Well Sony can't control 3rd party games quality, but their 1st party certainly trounces MS's. Spiderman 2 is going to a absolutely dominate the holiday season, just like ragnarok did this past holiday season. Sony easily has the best gaming studios out of the big three. It's.not Sony who has to worry about their 1st part output, it is MS.

MIDGETonSTILTS17441d ago

@Obscure: what AAA games would I buy an XsX today to play?

I own a ps5 and XsX, and I don’t know of one game that would have motivated me to buy an XsX ( I bought it to appease my dumb Xbot friends).

I bought a ps5 for Demon Souls (best looking game on consoles), Returnal (top 10 game of all time for me), and Dualsense upgrades for shooters (completely changes R6 for me).

So, can you illustrate how XsX is competing? I liked HiFi Rush a lot, High on Life too, but neither make we happy about the $500 I sunk into the hardware to play them.

Mr_cheese441d ago

Obscurer, you're saying an awful lot without talking much sense at all.

VR isn't a distraction, neither does it take games away from playstation. Sony have been building and harnessing studios just for this while working on their 1st party none VR titles.

Microsoft is fully committed to gamepass and that's fine for them and those that like to game that way. It will be an even better product if Microsoft can nail their 1st party games.

What I'd hate to see are more moves like the Activision and Bethesda purchases and attempts because it destroys the gaming ecosystem. I'd say the same for Sony as well because once the ball is rolling, they'll all start buying and diving gaming.

Obscure_Observer440d ago (Edited 440d ago )

"I can bet that one company brings actual competition, isn’t afraid to share losing numbers, and doesn’t buy huge publishers due to said weaknesses. That’s what I can bet."

Unfortunately for you, MS or Nintendo aren´t forced to play by yours or Sony´s rules. Fyi, Sony used to buy publishers back in the day. The only reason they aren´t doing it now is simply because they can´t.

As it is, Sony already owns 14.09% of Kadokawa´s shares while Tencent acquired 16% of the company's shares, which means 1/3 of the entire company ownership.

The only reason why Tencent owns more than Sony is because Sony couldn´t pay more for it. So spare me from this "victim complex" bs defense for Sony.

Phil acted as the "nice guy" for too long. To the point where stupid fanboys were all happy when Xbox acquired new studios and publishers, because the idiots were under the illusion that all future Xbox games would become multiplatform and be released on Playstation.

Yeah, they were stupid to the point of thinking that MS would turn into a third party developer for Playstation.

Reality hits hard and here we are. Now that they KNOW those games aren´t coming to Playstation, all that they can do now is cry and moan over games paid and developed by Microsoft to not be on their platform of choice.

They think they´re entitled to have anything and everything otherwise it´s not good competition.

Phil Spencer won´t stop. Be the Activision/Blizzard deal approved or not, he can just go after a single studio like CDPR for example and you´ll be here crying all the same.

I don´t care if Sony or Nintendo buys SquareEnix, From Software or even SEGA tomorrow. Because I have no problem buying products from those companies if they have the games I want. I care about games first and foremost. So don´t expect me to be on your sad place complaining about big a$$ companies running their business as they see fit.

Lightning77440d ago

"You should want THEM to feel enough heat to actually do better."

But when they do attempt to do better ppl complain about it.

BehindTheRows440d ago

@Lightning77

What genuine attempts have people complained about?

Lightning77439d ago

With the whole Bethesda thing. There was article on here not too long ago talking about how Bethesda investment will pay off for MS. The whole comment section everyone was whining about how MS was taking games away. So when MS competes everyone here complains on here. No matter what MS hurts feelings. It's quite funny actually.

BehindTheRows439d ago

@Lightning77

In other words, outside of publisher acquisitions, they have not really attempted to compete.

And "whining" happens on both sides, so I hope you are just as entertained when people bitch and moan about moves Sony makes.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 439d ago
Crows90441d ago

Ps+ extra already has better games than gamepass. Just look at the highest scoring games...ps extra has more of them.

Obscure_Observer441d ago

Lol. What a joke.

PS+ relies on old games. Gamepass not only has day one first party games but also day one third party as well. Even from Sony. XD

S2Killinit441d ago (Edited 441d ago )

Exactly. “Day one” is a buzz word that makes these guys think they have a better line up but it has not amounted to much. If you look at what they have at any given time on their service its not that rosy. Not to mention “day one” also exists on PS plus just not for the first party AAA story games (which is fine w me as long as they continue making the hits).

Check out their list of day one releases for all the years they had gamepass. Its a joke.

Crows90441d ago (Edited 441d ago )

@obscure

I'd take good old games then new Bad games. Besides that wasn't his point and that has nothing to do with what I claimed. The op said that they should offer better games but they already offer better games. He did not say new games. Or even New Quality games. But to your point, I know that game pass lovers do enjoy their day one bad or mediocre games. It's all about value with you guys and not quality

GamingSinceForever441d ago

Some are going ape shit over Hi-Fi Rush but completely forgot about the Tokyo Wire dud the same developer last released. My point being there are hits and misses.

441d ago
441d ago
Obscure_Observer441d ago (Edited 441d ago )

" It's all about value with you guys and not quality"

Lol. Your false narrative didn´t aged well.

All Metacritic scores for day one first party games
.
Ori and the Will of the Wisps 92 on Metacritic
Flight Simulator 90 on Metacritic
Forza Horizon 5 92 on Metacritic
Halo Infinite 87 on Metacritic
Grounded 85 on Metacritic
Pentiment 87 on Metacritic
Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition 87 on Metacritic
Hi-Fi Rush 88 on Metacritic

And that´s only from first party games/IPs on Xbox series consoles.

So much for your "quality vs quantity" BS narrative.

Oh, and we "Gamepass Lovers" also love old quality games as well. I also can give you a large list of high quality third party on Gamepass. Just ask. ;)

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 441d ago
GamingSinceForever441d ago

@Obscure_Observer… Forspoken was not a 1st party game from Sony nor should it be treated as such. Square Enix will comeback nicely with FFXVI I’m sure.

Besides Sony is entitled to some misses here and there because they actually take chances on new titles and release them regularly.

Bu the time Spiderman 2 releases everyone will have forgotten all about this terrible start you’re claiming.

Crows90441d ago

They're so anxious to try to nail Sony on something that they'll even bring up third party developers not under Sony. Oh look this time's exclusive that wasn't developed by a Sony studio was bad so Sony doesn't know how to do good games.

441d ago
Obscure_Observer441d ago

"@Obscure_Observer… Forspoken was not a 1st party game from Sony nor should it be treated as such. Square Enix will comeback nicely with FFXVI I’m sure."

In no moment I said it´s a first party game. Both Forspoken and FFXVI are exclusive Playstation 5 games which Sony invested large sums of money to secure to their platform. Just like the original Spiderman from Insomniac. (which till this day Sony fans treat it like a first party/IP)

So it´s pretty obvious if the game fails, Sony also fails and loses tons of money which could had been invested on first party games.

"Besides Sony is entitled to some misses here and there because they actually take chances on new titles and release them regularly."

True.

"Bu the time Spiderman 2 releases everyone will have forgotten all about this terrible start you’re claiming."

Also true. The same can be said about FFXVI, imo.

Abear21441d ago

The leader, Nintendo, doesn’t care what the competition does.

Obscure_Observer440d ago

"The leader, Nintendo, doesn’t care what the competition does."

Couldn´t agree more

BehindTheRows440d ago

The Switch is leading the PS5 because it launched three years prior. PS4 won last gen is all forms (money made, units sold, software totals).

No hate for Nintendo though, as they are another company who actually puts out quality games in high numbers, but just a little perspective.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 439d ago
Orchard441d ago

“In 2022, Microsoft took the lead with 60-70% of total MAUs”

From 20-30% up to 60-70%? That’s some crazy growth. Probably thanks to Fortnite.

SurgicalMenace441d ago

That's what's up, young fella. You feel better now?

The Wood441d ago

All the other stats dont matter. Especially the ones where ps is tearing xbox a new one

441d ago
Obscure_Observer441d ago

“In 2022, Microsoft took the lead with 60-70% of total MAUs”

Probably one of reasons why Sony won´t return Activision´s calls.

BehindTheRows441d ago

Oh, yeah, THAT must be it….

Outside_ofthe_Box441d ago

You're not asking for numbers now, I noticed? 🤣

Orchard440d ago (Edited 440d ago )

Oops, somebody didn't read the article.

This isn't a "YoY increase". It's market share, so we know they had 60-70% of the streaming market.

MIDGETonSTILTS17441d ago

That’s why we game: to celebrate YoY growth!

Three cheers for first-party content-starving fueling third party max’s and subscriptions.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 440d ago
Tacoboto440d ago

What a clickbait headline. Why mention 2021, when the tides turned in 2022 for the obvious reason of one company making the Cloud service one of their biggest marketing pushes throughout the entire year while the other company was able to promote the games they had coming out?

And it's imprudent to suggest crazy growth when we only know proportions - did Xbox grow its proportion by attracting from the competitors' bases, did their marketing pay off and attract new users, or did cloud gamers on competitors just not play as much? The MAU figures don't point to shifts as significant as the Cloud proportions do, and Microsoft's lack of raw subscriber numbers that they happily boasted about in 2021 is telling too.

70°

Assassin's Creed Odyssey available on PC and Xbox Game Pass today

Ubisoft's brilliant Assassin's Creed Odyssey will become available via Xbox and PC Game Pass today, Microsoft has annou…

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
RavenWolfx588d ago

At the time of this comment, I am not seeing Odyssey on Xbox or PC yet.

320°

56 Games to Leave PS Now in May Including Metal Gear Solid 4

The PlayStation Brahs:

"Playstation Now will soon cease as exist as it combines with PlayStation Plus to be one super subscription, titles that won't carryover to the PlayStation Plus revamp will begin to leave the service in May."

Read Full Story >>
theplaystationbrahs.com
Orchard729d ago

Wait, what? I thought PS+ premium would carry over the games from PSNow?

Also this basically leaves MGS4 dead in the boneyard unless you play via RPCS3…

TGGJustin729d ago

That was never going to be the case. Sony said that Premium would have 340 PS3, PS2, and PS1 games. There are like 400 PS3 games alone on PS Now right now so it was obvious some of them weren't going to carry over.

darthv72729d ago

If they are just combining forces... there is no reason why any games would leave. Unless they were already planning on removing them regardless of the merge (licensing issues).

Orchard729d ago

MGS could be licensing I guess - isn’t the HD collection still unavailable / in licensing hell?

I’d like to think Konami are yanking everything MGS because they’re about to announce a 1-5 collection but… we know Konami better than that.

TGGJustin729d ago (Edited 729d ago )

I forgot to include PSP in my comment. So yeah you can see that when Sony says there will be 340 PS3, PS2, PS1, and PSP games while there are currently 400 PS3 games on PS Now that a good chunk of those current PS3 games are going away. They aren't just rolling them all onto the new PS+ otherwise the number would be much higher than 340

Orchard729d ago

Yeah I guess I just never really did the math on the numbers they announced so this caught me off guard.

Eonjay729d ago

PSnow is a platform and it will not exist after next month. Them being on one service doesn't automatically mean that they will be on another service. Contracts are drawn up and compensation may include things like per player reimbursement. Therefore you shouldn't automatically expect a game to go from one platform to another.... if Sony can strike a deal with Konami then the game will come to plus (if it already hasn't been decided).

But to be clear all PSNow games are leaving the service because the service will cease to exist.

JackBNimble727d ago

400 ps3 games that you have " no Choice" but to stream, doesn't make me want to upgrade ps+ . As it is , if you keep the basic ps+ you're going to lose1of the 3 games a month to begin with.

Nothing here for the new upcoming service seems like a worthwhile subscription.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 727d ago
ApocalypseShadow729d ago (Edited 729d ago )

Or, you know, you could play it on an actual PS3.

If you don't have one there's almost 90 million systems to track down, cop one and do that.

Here's the game too
https://www.ebay.com/itm/40...

Orchard729d ago

Is that you Don Mattrick?

The ideal solution would be a proper back compat implementation.

I shouldn’t have to crack out my 16 year old console to play a legendary game like MGS.

Also MGS was basically a PS franchise yet somehow it’s now basically an Xbox franchise if you want to play it nowadays.

Hopefully the new “preservation” team at Sony tackle this problem.

mkis007729d ago

Orchard

4 isnt on xbox. Incomplete series on xbox. Pc you would need now.

Orchard729d ago

@mkis The PC is always the place where you can get everything thanks to emulators etc.

But still, XSX and XB1 plays substantially more metal gear games than any other recent console, so my statement stands true.

King_Noctis729d ago

Or you know, you could play it on the console that you ACTUALLY HAVE without having to resort to ebay to buy a a console from two gen ago with scalper’s price.

itsmebryan729d ago (Edited 729d ago )

I have a OG PS3 (big boy) just gathering dust. I think it even plays PS2 games. I guess I'll put it on eBay.

thornintheside729d ago (Edited 729d ago )

so basically throw money at the problem.

sure it works, as long as not everyone is doing it. Is it ideal?....maybe for the sellers

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 729d ago
ApocalypseShadow729d ago

Oh. So orchard can lie and say that the only way to play the game is through an emulator. Which is false.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/13...
Here's a console for $50 and 7 games. Buy MGS4 above and that's 55 bucks before shipping. Can play it forever.

Orchard729d ago

“Also this basically leaves MGS4 dead in the boneyard unless you play via RPCS3…”

Looks like what I wrote is accurate if your only alternative is to go on eBay and buy a console from 3 generations ago which is no longer manufactured.

Thanks for reinforcing my point.

TravsVoid729d ago

I agree you should buy a PS3 if you are really interested in it's games but don't come on here linking to a eBay auction that has a price that will definitely increase before it ends and act like that is what they sell for. More accurate prices seem to be around $100.

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i....

Only reason I want PS3 emulation on PS5 is because a lot of the original games aren't even 1080p, some even sub 720p and we could see these games up to 4k and smoother framerates on PS5.

Z501729d ago

He forgets. Some of us still have PS3's. So, RPCS3 is NOT the only way.

SonyStyled729d ago (Edited 729d ago )

Orchard, PSNow has 800+ games. PS+ Premium was announced for 700+ games. Some games were expected to be removed as one service cancelled and combined for another, and now we know which ones. What are you so surprised about, or did you not know PS+ Premium was loosing 100 games from PSNow while simultaneously being compared to a Gamepass competitor?
And yes actually, a lot of lifetime PS gamers have a PS3. I have one in my living room with the rest of my consoles and one in my bedroom. They aren’t like ancient record players today like their competing consoles. The PS3 came with features we expect today in a new device that were very premium for 2006 hardware. I can use my PS3 as a blu-ray player in 2022. I can’t with my 360 since 2005. I can also put MGS4 in my PS3 in 2022, or any of my 220+ on the game shelf.

I think you’re scaling PS gamers abandoning their prior consoles at the rate Xbox gamers did with the 360 and One. If you are a gamer and enjoy PS, chances are you don’t have to ‘crack’ out a 16 year old device and suffocate on the floor in a web of cords around your neck wishing we were loyal to Phil Spencer to swoop in like Superman to save us from imminent death

729d ago
outsider1624729d ago

I sure hope MGS4 comes to PS pass or whatever. It's the one game i want to replay. Man i loved that game.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 727d ago
Petebloodyonion729d ago

It's actually a lot of games that will leave at the same time.
Probably to leave some space for the PSP games that are gonna be added to the premium service.
As for MGS4, I would expect Konami to be behind the move.

TheColbertinator729d ago (Edited 729d ago )

Unfortunate that MGS4 is leaving regardless. Played it with PSNow on PC and enjoyed having one of my favorite PS3 games to play again.

TravsVoid729d ago

It's going to suck if these PSP and PS2 games they are referencing are the few already released on PS4 store which were included with PS Now.

Cackocacho729d ago

Ah, yes. Bask in the "service" era. Where what you see today, is not what you'll see tomorrow, thanks to an overcomplicated system.

The "service", is simply, off the charts.

gangsta_red729d ago

Complicated how?

Also, you can always buy the game. Just like other services that offer third party content, they are on their for a limited time or however long the contract holds.

BrainSyphoned729d ago

Well, yes, when I subscribe to a service I hope to have different games cycle through. PS Now gives you a time frame to finish the games you want to try and Xbox is generally a year for most titles. They both give warning when titles are leaving. There are multiple web pages dedicated to each service if you need help figuring out which carton of milk needs finished first.

TravsVoid729d ago

Big difference between PS Now games leaving that are only available for streaming and games you can purchase even if they leave the service. Every game on Game Pass you can purchase without a subscription unlike PS Now.

thornintheside729d ago (Edited 729d ago )

im not really sure how the complexity of the PS3 architecture, and the "service" era are related. They seem like two completely separate entities with no interaction worthy of mentioning. Maybe you meant it as a problem that can exists in both entities.

Vengeance1138729d ago

So when games leave PS Now, it's a huge issue but when games leave GamePass it's just fine? All subscription services have games / movies leave all the time.

Vengeance1138729d ago

Everyone whining and crying in this comment section?

TravsVoid729d ago

You can still purchase every single Game Pass game regardless of if it's on the service. If a PS3 game leaves PS Now it's gone for good, do you understand the difference?

Bathyj728d ago

I do.
You're saying owning a game is better than renting it. I agree.

King_Noctis729d ago

I think it is the other way around.

GoodGuy09729d ago

This is why I dislike subscriptions lol.

Show all comments (47)